- Chargers notes: Do the Bolts have the best receiving corps in football?
- Los Angeles Clippers Media Day 2014: ‘This is our time’
- Jaguars vs. Chargers, Week 4: Bolts win third straight, 33-14
- 4 things learned about the NFC West
- Pac-12 Las Vegas Outlook: Week 4
- Ben McLemore relaxed after lost rookie year
- Giants playoff tickets 209 percent above season average
- Angels playoff tickets up 257 percent from season average
- Marcus Mariota and the way-too-early Heisman watch
- Chargers news: Donald Brown ready to lead Bolts’ backfield
NFL tuck rule: Raiders tweet approval of possible reversal
- Updated: March 15, 2013
The NFL is seriously considering eliminating the infamous “tuck rule” that has caused more controversy than it was meant to stop.
No franchise is happier about this development than the team that it affected most:
Tuck Rule? It’s been 11 years, 1 month and 23 days…but who’s counting? twitter.com/RAIDERS/status…
— OAKLAND RAIDERS (@RAIDERS) March 14, 2013
The most well-known instance of the misuse of the controversial rule was during the 2002 AFC Divisional game between the Oakland Raiders and the New England Patriots that vaulted Pats into status as a dynasty. Tom Brady appeared to fumble the ball after Raiders cornerback Charles Woodson appeared to knocked the ball out of his hands with a clear recovery by Oakland.
But the call didn’t stand, and the Patriots maintained possession, tied the game and went on to win in overtime. Since then, the tuck rule has affected countless other games, with three notable instances in 2012 occurring in the same week. Now, plays that were in the gray area of being a fumble due to the rule can be called more in line with how they appear as the intent can now be factored in.
It’s one of those rules that a lot of fans don’t understand and that also handcuffs officials into making what could be an obvious wrong decision based on the letter of the rule. It states that if a passer has his arm moving forward and loses the ball in the process, then it should be deemed an incomplete pass and not a fumble. However, quarterbacks often tuck the ball away and prepare to scramble or take a sack in the process, and as a result, many plays that should have otherwise resulted in fumbles and recoveries for teams did not.
This has been a long-time coming, and fans in California have to wonder what would have happened had the rule been interpreted differently in this historic game.
Latest posts by Michael C. Jones (see all)
- Padres fall to Rockies, 3-2 despite testing Jorge De La Rosa - September 23, 2014
- Bud Black on Padres long-term success: ‘It’s more personal’ - September 23, 2014
- 49ers, Cardinals fans brawl in Glendale: How San Francisco lost twice - September 23, 2014