- Adam Gase was 49ers’ choice for head coach before final interview, per report
- Byron Scott dismisses talk of Kobe Bryant retirement
- NFL investigating New England Patriots for deflated footballs
- Marshawn Lynch may face discipline for media silence, lewd gesture
- Jack Del Rio says he’s been a ‘Raider his whole life’
- 3 things we learned from Clippers’ 126-121 loss to Cavaliers
- Jim Tomsula is an awkward interview, should 49ers fans be worried?
- Jordan Farmar calls being waived by Clippers ‘mutual’
- Padres to host 2016 MLB All-Star game at Petco Park
- Clippers get Austin Rivers in 3-team trade involving Reggie Bullock
NFL tuck rule: Raiders tweet approval of possible reversal
- Updated: March 15, 2013
The NFL is seriously considering eliminating the infamous “tuck rule” that has caused more controversy than it was meant to stop.
No franchise is happier about this development than the team that it affected most:
Tuck Rule? It’s been 11 years, 1 month and 23 days…but who’s counting? twitter.com/RAIDERS/status…
— OAKLAND RAIDERS (@RAIDERS) March 14, 2013
The most well-known instance of the misuse of the controversial rule was during the 2002 AFC Divisional game between the Oakland Raiders and the New England Patriots that vaulted Pats into status as a dynasty. Tom Brady appeared to fumble the ball after Raiders cornerback Charles Woodson appeared to knocked the ball out of his hands with a clear recovery by Oakland.
But the call didn’t stand, and the Patriots maintained possession, tied the game and went on to win in overtime. Since then, the tuck rule has affected countless other games, with three notable instances in 2012 occurring in the same week. Now, plays that were in the gray area of being a fumble due to the rule can be called more in line with how they appear as the intent can now be factored in.
It’s one of those rules that a lot of fans don’t understand and that also handcuffs officials into making what could be an obvious wrong decision based on the letter of the rule. It states that if a passer has his arm moving forward and loses the ball in the process, then it should be deemed an incomplete pass and not a fumble. However, quarterbacks often tuck the ball away and prepare to scramble or take a sack in the process, and as a result, many plays that should have otherwise resulted in fumbles and recoveries for teams did not.
This has been a long-time coming, and fans in California have to wonder what would have happened had the rule been interpreted differently in this historic game.
Latest posts by Michael C. Jones (see all)
- Adam Gase was 49ers’ choice for head coach before final interview, per report - January 20, 2015
- NFL investigating New England Patriots for deflated footballs - January 19, 2015
- Jim Tomsula is an awkward interview, should 49ers fans be worried? - January 16, 2015